Structures look interesting because you can reorder entries manually, generate breadcrumbs and visually see a hierarchy of entries. Besides this, what are the primary consideration when choosing a Structure over a Channel?

1 Answer 1


Ordering and Hierarchy are the main benefits but they create a couple of side benefits such as the ability to

  • get the "children" and "parents" of an entry
  • get siblings including next and previous siblings

The best part is there no real downside, they have all the features and functions of a regular channel PLUS the structure.

  • 1
    Also worth noting: You can always convert a Channel into a Structure or vice versa, without loosing field-data.
    – Victor
    Commented Sep 7, 2014 at 18:37
  • 3
    The only downside of a structure over a channel is that there is overhead associated with keeping track of all that extra information (hierarchy, ordering, etc.). If you don't need the features of a structure, then a channel is much more efficient.
    – Brad Bell
    Commented Sep 7, 2014 at 19:47
  • 2
    "much more efficient" - how much so? What sort of performance impact are we talking here? Commented Apr 25, 2016 at 10:27
  • I see no one replied to that for years, but I'll chime in: it's more efficient on large websites to use channels instead of structure because mysql has to make extra queries and fetch extra data to generate pagination (prev entry, next entry, count entries to generate number of pages, etc.). You can see a similar performance problem with WordPress (if you don't use pagination, you can declare an option called "no_found_rows" that removes those extra queries). On a smaller database, it's not much noticeable though, so take with a grain of salt.
    – davidwebca
    Commented Oct 28, 2022 at 14:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.