4

As you can see from the image below, the icons are missing from redactor I. Has anybody else had this issue? Running dev tools in chrome shows no errors.

Bold, for example has the following css selector:

.re-bold:before { content: "\e618"; }

I see that the @font-face src is base64 encoded right into the CSS file, so the issue can't be because of a missing font file for the icons can it?

Missing icons in Redactor I

Here is the bold link inspected in dev tools:

enter image description here

As you see there is no mention of .re-icon in the markup, but the only declaration of the font-family: 'RedactorFont' is for the .re-icon selector class. So adding .re-button::before to the selector that declares the font results in this:

enter image description here

...Close but not quite right. I shouldn't be editing these files, but am just doing so to help diagnose this. Presumably this redactor.css file shouldn't be referenced... it should be redactori.css?

Improve this question
2
  • Here is the markup for the start of the text editor in the admin area, notice id="redactor-toolbar-0"....... <div class="redactor-box" role="application" dir="ltr"><ul class="redactor-toolbar" id="redactor-toolbar-0"
    – Adam Menczykowski
    Jan 19 '16 at 10:00
  • Although the config for this particular Redactor instance requests 'formatting' in its redactori syntax, the field does not show 'formatting'. All this is pointing towards the fact that this field is Redactor II even though it shouldn't be.
    – Adam Menczykowski
    Jan 19 '16 at 10:08
3

It seemed that for some reason my fields said they were Redactor I but were in fact Redactor II.

Reinstalling Redactor I did the trick.

Improve this answer
3
  • 2
    You probably created a new Rich Text field (non-Redactor I) after you had installed the plugin, which will cause conflicts like this.
    – Brandon Kelly
    Jan 19 '16 at 13:47
  • I think I may have either done that Brandon, or perhaps incorrectly synced the DB after installing the plugin, thus making all Rich Text fields Redactor II again!
    – Adam Menczykowski
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:53
  • Ugh — Redactor II… It would be nice if Redactor I being installed could remove "Rich Text" as being an option, as this was a pretty vexing issue
    – Patrick Harrington
    Apr 9 '16 at 18:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.